Home | About Us | Contact  | Newsletter | Have Something to Say? | Sitemap

1.877.240.9777 Toll Free

 
 

 Suggestion #2 Suggestion #3 Suggestion #4

 
 
 

 

The Good about Project Server

 

The Bad and Ugly about Project Server

 

Suggestions for Project Server Deployment

> Subscribe to our free Newsletter

> 02/15/2006
PSSI Launched a free reporting tool for understanding how Project Server 2003 users are complying with directives. Download Project Server Compliance Reporting Tool (PCRT) today!

> 12/01/2007
SP1 for EPM 2007 expected mid December, 07

  Suggestions for Microsoft Project Server (EPM) deployment

#4: When you shop for services base your choices on value not price. We are Wal-Mart culture and most Americans will buy cheap over quality or sustainability most days of the week. We demand access, availability, and cheap. Most of us who have been involved with computing remember that one of the primary reasons we standardized on Microsoft products was that they were cheap. Cheap operating system that ran on cheap hardware, free browser software, and if we purchased one set up products we might get other software thrown into the purchase for free. SQL was free at one time, Windows SharePoint Services is free today.

Experience: We were working with a large communications company on project management software selection about 15 years ago. This is what they said, "We know that other software is better than Winproj (an early name used for Microsoft Project), but we are going to standardize on Office, and well, Microsoft told us they are going to throw in a couple of thousand copies of Winproj for free, so we are going with Winproj." 

Firefox is rapidly cutting into the dominance of the free Internet Explorer for several good reasons, but we don't think we would see this adoption if it wasn't also free. Most of us use Google for searches and we know that Google makes about 5 cents for each search we make, but I don't think we would use the tool if they charged us for each search.

There isn't anything wrong with wanting cheap, but when it comes to consulting services you need to think more in terms of value. For example, let's say you want someone to come in and do an EPM presentation for a day with a group of your decision makers and you want everyone to get a very close look at EPM and you want to talk about deployment strategy, requirements, issues, etc.

You look around and come up with a list of people who can come and spend a day with you. One company is out of town and will come in for $2,300 and you have to pay travel costs so the total change is $3,500. Another firm tells you that they will charge you half their daily rate of $1,800, and third firm says that they will do it for free, with the hopes that you hire them to do the deployment for you.

So who do you select? We think that the question of price at this point shouldn't even be a primary concern. We know that price is certainly an issue at some point, but the initial selection process should be based on value and then value needs to be weighted with cost. You should first be asking questions related to who is going to present the most accurate and straight forward presentation of the system, and who has the most expertise and his willing to tell us what we need to hear?

The consulting world is very different than the product world. Credible individuals and firms sell their expertise and work off a pretty standard social exchange economic model (price paid = value provided). Good firms want to increase their value because that is the only way they can increase their rates.  They are not in a position to sell more product to increase profit and they only have so many billable hours during a year. They simply don't do work for free and they don't work cheaply. Not if they are any good.

If you are thinking EPM, you have a lot at stake. This is going to be a costly venture; you are going to have to spend a lot of time to get this to work for you. There is exposure, risk, and most everyone associated with projects will be involved to some degree with an EPM solution.

These are some points worth considering:

  • The cost of help is going to be a fraction of the actual cost of deployment and extra money spent on the best consulting and training will save you considerable money and grief later on during deployment.
  • Even with the best consultants you need to "consider the source" and try to determine if what they tell you has an underlying agenda that is inconsistent with your objectives.
  • Shop value first, cost second.
  • Don't just assume the most costly sources are the most experienced and honest - but don't buy cheap. In the consulting and training world there is always a reason for "cheap" and it isn't altruism.
  • Ultimately, all consulting and training should help lead you to complete ownership and self-reliance.
 

ms project server training microsoft project server implementation epm solutions business links  ●  installing microsoft project server  project server deployment bootcamp ●  project server 2003 support center  ●  microsoft project server 2003 training ●   enterprise project management specialist  ●  project server solutions ●  project server compliance reporting tool (PCRT) ●  project server consulting  ●  project server deployment models

Copyright 2006 Project Server Support, Inc. All rights reserved. Tampa St. Petersburg Tallahassee, Florida